Submitting my research article …

Standard

Yesterday, I finally pushed the big green “Submit” button on the research article that I’ve been working on sporadically for nearly two years. Pressing that button provided a relief, though an anticlimatic one; seeing years of my life summed up in a file just 46kb small felt more painful than joyous.

But for now I’ve done what I can, and I need to wait for the journal staff to give their verdict. However, that could be a slow process. When I and two other students helped  with another study during our undergraduate degree, it wasn’t fully published until three years later. Hopefully, my paper won’t need too many revisions, but I’m not naive enough to think it will be waved through unchanged.


I’m glad to have a version of the paper complete, and I’m fairly happy with my work. So far, I’m annoyed about only one aspect. As part of studying science communication, and from my own interests, I’ve read quite a bit about the failure points of academic writing – how it can be jargon-laden,  hard to read, and artificially exclusive.  I’ve read about how to make academic writing more lively and well-crafted, and how to make it better do its job of communicating. After diving into this new topic, I wanted to try out those new techniques and approaches. But in the end I stuck with the conventional approach, the passive, impersonal “view from nowhere”.

Thinking about this logically, I shouldn’t be too annoyed. That advice, and those techniques, are usually not intended for people writing their first paper. They’re intended for established researchers. So right now I’m concentrating on the old quote about how you have to know the rules before you can break them.  Trying to be unconventional on my first primary-author paper may have instead come across as me not knowing the rules at all.

In terms of writing, I sought to make the paper as friendly and readable as I could, within the conventional bounds. I tried to avoid overusing jargon, to choose effective words rather than jumping to longer, clunkier defaults, and to explain ideas so they would make sense to people outside of the area. The start of the paper did this part fairly well, and I’m definitely happy with my introduction. So overall, I’m hopeful that it won’t need too much revising.

One thought on “Submitting my research article …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.